Skip to content

Science Consistently Shows Conversion Therapy to be Harmful and Ineffective

IPA river inspired pattern

Science Consistently Shows Conversion Therapy to be Harmful and Ineffective

The Iowa Psychological Association Public Education Committee has the sole purpose of bringing to the public’s awareness psychological research and science in about issues relevant to Iowans. The purpose of this committee is to inform and educate based on scientific research.  With that in mind, we share the following regarding the science on sexual orientation and the lack of science supporting sexual reorientation/conversion therapy.

In 1990, Dr. Bryant Welch, American Psychological Association Executive Director stated, “Research findings suggest that efforts to repair homosexuals (sic) are nothing more than social prejudice garbed in psychological accoutrements.” Since then, mainstream medical and psychological health associations have taken unequivocal stances against what is called conversion, reparative, or reorientations therapies due to lack of scientific evidence to support positive impact of these interventions, and the plethora of evidence documenting harm. These organizations include: American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, American Academy of Family Physicians, American Academy of Nursing, American Academy of Pediatrics, American Association of Marriage & Family Therapy, American College of Physicians, American Counseling Association, American Medical Association, American Medical Student Association, American Psychiatric Association, American Psychoanalytic Association, American Psychological Association, American School Health Association, American School Counselor Association, American School Health Association, National Association of Social Workers, Pan American Health Organization, School Social Work Association of America, and others.

These organizations, representing the majority of U.S. medical and psychological health professionals, have taken this stance not because of political positioning, but because, as the American Psychological Association (2021) noted:

The APA affirms that scientific evidence and clinical experience indicate that sexual orientation change efforts (SOCE) put individuals at significant risk of harm;

APA encourages individuals, families, health professionals, and organizations to avoid SOCE;

APA affirms that same-gender and multiple-gender attraction, feelings, and behavior are normal variations in human sexuality, being LGBTQ+ is not a mental disorder, and APA opposes portrayals of sexual minorities as mentally ill because of their sexual orientation;

APA opposes making claims that sexual orientation can be changed through SOCE and;

APA, because of evidence of harm and lack of evidence of efficacy, supports public policies and legislation that oppose, prohibit, or aim to reduce SOCE, heterosexism, and monosexism and that increase support for sexual orientation diversity.

These organizations have taken stances validating the inherent worth, dignity, and validity of sexual/affectional orientation due to the lack of conclusive empirical evidence that supports that any one sexual/affectional orientation is less or more mentally and physically healthy.  In fact, the data is so consistent, these organizations had no other choice but to take these stances to uphold their own foundations of evidence-based decision making. Those who continue to advocate for reorientation continue to perpetuate the reductionist, bipolarity construct of sexual/affectional orientation that science left behind 50 years ago when the American Psychiatric Association declassified homosexuality as a mental health concern in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. A review of the history of this decision can be found here.

The faulty assumptions imbued into the claims of reorientation are numerous and include:

  1. Sexual/affectional orientation is behavior that can be changed.  This approach ignores copious evidence connoting the multimodality of sexual/affectional orientation, including identity in research across the world.
  2. Sexual/affectional orientation is limited LGBQ people.  Sexual/affectional orientation is descriptive of all people, but Straight people are not expected to engage in reorientation. Research on what science understands about the development sexual orientation and cultural expression of sexual orientation can be found in the following: Biodevelopment of Same-Sex Sexual Orientation  ,  Biological Research on Development of Sexual OrientationHuman Sexual OrientationSexual Orientation, Controversy, and ScienceStability and Change in Sexual Orientation
  3. Religion condemns LGBQ orientation. Reorientation could be sought for religious choice. However, people who identify as LGBQ do not have to abdicate their right to participate in religious practice.  Major U.S religions support LGBQ orientations include: American Baptist Church; Disciples of Christ; Episcopal Church; Metropolitan Community Church; Presbyterian Church, USA; Reform Judaism; Society of Friends; Unitarian Universalist Church; Buddhism, United Church of Christ, Congregational, and others.
  4. Research supports reorientation therapy.  Research supporting reorientation therapy has been criticized for problems with poor methodology, biased participant selection, statistical analyses, and inadequate outcome measures. Unethical behavior, sexual abuse, deception, and theological malpractice are also rife throughout this literature.  The confines here do not allow for detailing all of this research, though objective reviews can be found from infinitely wide sources including the Minnesota Department of HealthCornell University, to the Government of the United Kingdom.
  5. Straight is the standard.  There is a systematic bias toward straight orientation and a faulty mainstay assertion within reparative therapy is that people who are LGBQ are undeveloped, regressed, and fixated. Journal of Personality and Social Psychologyand Behavioral Sciences
  6. Reorientation therapies only help. An overwhelming number of studies note the harmful impact, ethical violations of, or ineffectiveness of conversion therapy. For a review see J Med Regul. 2016; 102(2): 7–12, and the Oxford Journal of Legal Studies

 

These are a few of the many faulty and specious assumptions that undergird this movement.  The leading national organizations who represent the majority of U.S. licensed medical and psychological providers, clearly state that as there is no illness, there is no cure.  Legal prohibitions against such practices, which cannot sufficiently document positive outcomes over risk for harm, exist in 27 states+ D.C. and this number grows annually. It is time, as it is with all medical and mental health matters, to listen to the evidence and move on from practices whose predominant basis is bias, poor science, historical limitations, and societal prejudice.

Submitted by:

The Iowa Psychological Association Public Education Committee, ipa@iowapsychology.org

The Iowa Psychological Association Public Education Committee has the sole purpose of bringing to the public’s awareness psychological research and science in about issues relevant to Iowans. The purpose of this committee is to inform and educate based on scientific research.

The Gift of IPA Membership

IPA landscape inspired pattern

The Gift of IPA Membership

As we quickly approach the IPA renewal date, the Membership Committee would like to highlight a few of the many benefits of membership in this outstanding association.

Alissa DoobayNicole Keedy

Our association celebrated another strong year in 2023 and our membership numbers have remained robust. As of January 28, we have 304 members, 52 of whom are student members (quite an accomplishment – IPA has typically maintained a total 30-40 student members in recent history). In fact, IPA was recognized by APA for being one of the states with the highest proportion of licensed psychologists choosing to join their state psychological association – this is a testament to the wonderful community you all provide to psychologists across the state! Student membership has flourished since implementation of our Student Mentorship and Sponsored Student programs; thank you to those who responded to our recent call for sponsored student donations! IPA has continued to offer excellent professional development opportunities to members, including a fabulous spring wellness retreat called “Taking Care of Us,” our fall conference on Therapeutic Assessment, and additional trainings on Providing Affirming Care for Gender Diverse Youth, Ethics and Risk Management, and Clinical Psychopharmacology, among others. Members can access a wide variety of recorded trainings from this past year through our website. After the renewal process has ended, all renewed members will receive their annual code for four free online CEs to use in 2024!

Our Executive Council, committees, and other leadership have been hard at work implementing IPA’s Strategic Plan. The Diversity and Social Justice Committee has been increasing awareness and understanding of diverse populations and culturally responsive practices. The Finance Committee has been an excellent steward of IPA’s financial wellbeing. Our Advocacy Team continues advocate on behalf of all psychologists in the state by being a voice on legislative issues at the state and federal level, informing membership of action alerts on timely topics, and representing us during public meetings of the Iowa Board of Psychology. Recent Advocacy Team successes include a $10 million increase in Medicaid mental health rates and ensuring inclusion of testing codes, a $35 million increase in substance abuse treatment funding, and continued funding for Iowa internship and post-doctoral training sites. We are excited to announce the recent appointment of a new State Advocacy Coordinator. A big thank you to Dr. Melinda Green for your willingness to serve in this role! Internship and Postdoctoral training opportunities in Iowa are growing with support from our Training Director following the expansion of insurance reimbursement to psychology interns. After several years of dedication, the Policy and Procedures Manual workgroup is putting the final touches on our fully updated P&P Manual, which has been modernized to better reflect IPA’s current priorities, practices, and needs. These accomplishments are just the tip of the iceberg! If you are interested in learning more, this spring the Strategic Plan Committee will post our Year-End Strategic Plan report summarizing the goals and accomplishments of each IPA committee; this comprehensive report will be available on the IPA website under Member Resources.

We eagerly anticipate the opportunities 2024 will bring! Registration is already open for upcoming trainings on Cultural HumilityKetamine: Trends, Myths, Research, and Clinical Care, and Treating Obsessive Compulsive Disorder. Our Advocacy Team has set their priorities for the next year, and our P&P Workgroup is eager to turn their attention to updating IPA’s By-Laws (hooray!). In the next year, you will see some changes to the appearance of IPA as we embark on an exciting rebranding campaign, which will culminate in a website update and redesign. Under leadership of Dr. Jenna Paternostro, the Marketing Consultant Workgroup is now actively working with a consulting group regarding the updating of our logo and overall branding. Branding encompasses visual and design-related strategies to ensure our mission reaches our target audience, which includes both Iowa psychologists and Iowans seeking psychological services. We invite you to review additional member benefits on our website, which you are encouraged to share with others who may be interested in joining our thriving community.

On behalf of the Membership Committee, our Executive Director Suzanne Hull sent recruitment letters in September (originally written by Dr. Jody Jones with updates from Dr. Laura Fuller) to every psychologist who became newly licensed in Iowa since September 2022 and we had three newly licensed members join within one month. Student members have collaborated with full IPA members to meet with students from every doctoral program in Iowa for recruitment efforts (with clear results – we had 7 sponsored student members join within the month following the meetings). Student member Angelica Castro Bueno, in collaboration with IPA Student Representative Ashley Banta, created a beautiful infographic to print for student recruitment and to include on our website – it is well worth a look: https://iowapsychology.org/student-benefits-expanded.

In 2023, IPA hosted social events in Des Moines and Iowa City and an after-conference social that were well attended. Many thanks to Dr. Ashley Freemen, Dr. Sarah Fetter, Dr. Valerie Keffala, Dr. Lauren Garvin, Dr. Laura Fuller, and Executive Director Suzanne Hull for organizing these events. We look forward to social events planned for 2024.

Thank you to our many members who have renewed your membership. Every timely renewal helps to lighten the workload of the Membership Committee. If you have not renewed, you still have time! All non-renewed members will lose access to member benefits within a few weeks of the renewal date of February 1. For any members who have not yet completed their renewal, the easiest way is to click the link to your invoice, located at the bottom of one of the renewal emails you have received this month.  That link will take you to an invoice that you may either pay online or download to print with your mailed payment. When renewing your membership, please take a moment to ensure your email address and profile on our website are up-to-date. You can do so by visiting www.iowapsychology.org and, without logging in, review your profile for accuracy under the “Find a Psychologist” tab.  You can then log in to your account and make edits as needed.

We appreciate your continued support of IPA and we look forward to another great year of connection, education, advocacy, and growth!

To Join or Not to Join? – A Complex Question

IPA landscape inspired pattern

To Join or Not to Join? – A Complex Question

Members of the Iowa Psychological Association occasionally ask about IPA’s stance regarding the psychology interstate compact known as PsyPact. Most psychologists have received ample marketing from multiple sources regarding the primary stated objective: to increase ease of interstate telehealth practice, a widely supported objective for expanding psychological treatment accessibility. At the same time, these marketing messages provide limited information regarding the specific terms of PsyPact and thereby limit awareness of its challenges. The concept behind a compact like PsyPact contains some highly desirable components, while its implementation has left cause for concern. Upon examining specifics of the compact, concerns about patient protections become apparent. 

Due to these concerns, IPA has opposed adoption of PsyPact in Iowa in order to support ethical and sustainable psychological services in Iowa. It is worth noting that multiple state associations have expressed concerns about the rules of PsyPact that have kept their states from joining the compact (accessible via Internet search but not explicitly listed in the interest of discretion) and IPA leaders have encountered similar expressed concerns in private communications with current PsyPact members. It is the perspective of IPA that it would be best to wait for major concerns to be addressed before joining this compact (most notably, the compact’s current determination of the “home state” as the location of the psychologist). If PsyPact made changes to reduce the safety risks for Iowans, or if a feasible alternative were to become available, IPA would be open to reconsidering its stance. The primary concerns are detailed below.

PsyPact rules state, “For the purposes of this Compact, the provision of psychological services is deemed to take place at the physical location of the psychologist.  Additionally, psychologists participating in the compact are only required to be licensed in their home state. When a psychologist from another state provides telehealth services to an Iowa resident, the Iowa resident is in essence “digitally” traveling to the other state to receive the service. This is atypical for telehealth services, as typically the service location would be the location of the person receiving the service. Other compacts, such as the compact recently adopted in Iowa for licensed mental health counselors, consider the patient’s location to be the service location. With PsyPact, any violations of ethics or law would fall under the jurisdiction and responsibility of the other state rather than in Iowa. Two primary concerns relate to assigning the service location as the psychologist’s state.

1. When Iowa is not identified as the location of the service for Iowa residents, they are not guaranteed the protections that are well established in Iowa regulations. For example, Iowa is a Mandatory Reporting state for child and dependent adult abuse and Iowa has established that psychologists have a duty to warn of identifiable threats to an individual’s physical safety. Psychologists licensed in Iowa are required to receive routine training in Mandatory Reporting, which is monitored by the Board of Psychology, and to become familiar with the state’s regulations. Other states in the compact have permissive reporting (i.e., they may choose whether to report abuse or neglect) and a couple of the states do not have a duty to warn of serious threats of harm. Although PsyPact has included language that requires psychologists practicing across state lines to follow the regulations of each state in which their patients reside, the likelihood of Iowans receiving services from psychologists who are unfamiliar with our mandatory reporting or duty to warn laws is heightened within PsyPact.  

2. PsyPact psychologists providing telehealth to Iowans would NOT be granted Iowa licenses and would instead practice under the authority of the compact. If the Iowa Board were to learn of misconduct by a remote psychologist, the Iowa Board of Psychology would have virtually no authority to discipline (i.e., they could not place a sanction on their license), other than to petition PsyPact to revoke their ability to practice in Iowa. The lack of licensing in Iowa would also eliminate the ability of the Iowa Board to track who is actively working with Iowans via telehealth under PsyPact. The Iowa Board would also be unable to demand completion of any state-required trainings for PsyPact providers. Furthermore, an Iowan wishing to file a complaint regarding an out-of-state psychologist practicing within PsyPact would be expected to contact the licensing board within that psychologist’s home state and that state’s board would NOT be required to dedicate resources to residents outside their state, thus leaving Iowans without the ability to seek adequate protection and oversight regarding unethical practices. In other words, PsyPact redirects money and ability to maintain proper oversight away from the boards, and ultimately makes oversight extremely weak. Although, yes, the state is allowed to enforce their laws, the specific body that would ultimately enforce them is our licensing board – and they can neither investigate nor enforce if they do not have ample funds to function

With adoption of PsyPact, money would be filtered away from the licensing board as psychologists (especially those from out of state) instead paid their fees toward the compact. The cost of licenses is not wasted. Boards are self-funded in Iowa and need licensing fees to conduct investigations. If Iowa joined PsyPact, it is reasonable to expect that many out of state licensees (about 30% of total psychologists licensed in Iowa) could terminate their Iowa licenses and instead pay PsyPact. PsyPact then charges a fee to the participating state board for administration of the program. Iowa would be left with even fewer licensees and potentially have more investigations to perform. That seems more like a win for PsyPact than patients, local psychologists, or the Board. Other states have similar concerns, to the degree that they believe their boards may be completely defunct if their states joined PsyPact. We are worried about this potential outcome for Iowa if Iowa joined PsyPact. Iowans would potentially lose the public protection offered by our licensing board, the one entity enforcing our licensing laws.

In addition to telehealth practice, PsyPact permits the out-of-state psychologists 30 full days of in-person practice without requiring the normal Board request process for temporary practice. It does not appear that the Board would be notified when the provider without an Iowa license performed services in Iowa. Also concerning is the fact that not all participating states require the same licensure requirements, which may allow a psychologist who would not meet requirements for licensure in Iowa to circumvent Iowa’s well-established licensure rules by becoming licensed in a state with lower quality controls.

3. To improve accessibility, a psychologist could potentially spend less in annual licensing fees to practice telehealth in 1-2 neighboring states than they would spend annually for a PsyPact passport. In fact, becoming fully or temporarily licensed in neighboring states offers an excellent and convenient way to provide care for individuals who would otherwise seek care in their general region without joining a compact that may draw Iowa-residing psychologists to increase time spent practicing remotely and out of the state. If Iowa psychologists accepted patients from other states, they would become less accessible to Iowans. 

4. The Association of State and Provincial Psychology Boards (ASPPB) issues the e-passport and therefore determines who is eligible, while the PsyPact commission alters the compact itself. Each state that adopts the compact appoints a person of their choice to serve on the commission and most of these individuals are not psychologists. When states that have adopted PsyPact have brought up concerns similar to IPA’s concerns, it is often unclear who should address these questions (ASPPB or the commission) and often the questions remain unanswered. 

5. Insurance companies often require an individual to be licensed in the insurance’s state to accept them to their panel of providers. Psychologists practicing in a state via PsyPact have experienced barriers to receiving reimbursement from these insurance companies that have led to clients using out-of-network options or self-pay. Many third party payers have not made accommodations for compacts and there is reason to believe that some will not do so. 

IPA leadership is happy to answer any questions members may have regarding PsyPact. We would also welcome the opportunity to explore additional avenues for improving access to care for Iowans’ well-being.

President’s December 2023 Update and Farewell

Nic Holmberg

President’s December 2023 Update and Farewell

The year’s end is rapidly approaching, and what a year it’s been for IPA! You can read my updates from spring and summer here and here.

I think one of the most exciting things this year is that IPA created a Marketing Consultant Workgroup, headed by early career psychologist Dr. Jenna Paternostro. This workgroup’s task is to complete a rebranding and website redesign project! IPA wants to position itself as Iowa’s leader in mental and behavioral health. The Executive Council (EC) believes this project will attract new members and frame IPA and its members as the experts in psychological science to better serve the public. This is a stepwise project, and the first step of logo redesign is already underway. The workgroup is collaborating with SuperWink Studio, an Iowa-based design firm, to enhance IPA’s recognition among members and the public. We are on track and projected to launch the new logo in early spring. The second step in the process will be the website redesign, and we hope to have a contract for this work signed by the end of the year. The website redesign is intended to improve user experience, enhance IPA’s visibility and inclusivity, and increase accessibility of our public education resources. As a nerd for all things design, I could not be more excited about this project and how it will benefit IPA!

IPA has continued offering continuing education opportunities for its members. The second half of the year featured two training opportunities led by IPA members! Our Fall Conference was in October at which Dr. Krista Brittain presented on Therapeutic Assessment. Later that month, Dr. Allison Momany presented on gender identity and expression in neurodiverse youth. We are excited to continue these CE offerings in 2024. The first event planned is a 2-CE training event on Cultural Humility with IPA’s own Dr. Joyce Goins-Fernandez on January 26th from 1-3pm. You can register for the event here.

Registration is also open for our 2024 Spring Conference. It will be March 22-23 and will feature two presenters from Rogers Behavioral Health discussing OCD. Day 1 will have Dr. David Jacobi presenting “Obsessive Compulsive Disorder: Current Understand and Treatment Considerations,” and Day 2 will have Dr. Chad Wetterneck presenting “A Tour Across the OCD Spectrum.” You may register for either or both days here. The Program Planning Committee is pleased to bring you continuing education on this topic, as it has been highly requested by members.

The Policies and Procedures (P&P) Manual Workgroup, a subgroup of the Strategic Plan Committee, is approaching the end of a project that has been underway since 2021. This group includes Drs. Alissa DoobayNicole KeedyValerie Keffala, and myself. Dr. Ashley Freeman has provided editorial support, and Dr. Benge Tallman played a huge role in getting us up and running. This group was tasked with updating IPA’s P&P Manual including all committee descriptions, all EC position descriptions, all policies, and all operating procedures. I don’t think any of us had any idea exactly how big of a task this was. We initially thought this would be a one-year project; however, nearly three years later, the finish line is finally in sight! The changes made have been approved by the EC. We are so proud of the work that we’ve done because the finished document will be the go-to place to find answers to all the “how do we…?” and “what is the…?” questions about IPA operations. In 2024, the P&P workgroup will be proposing some bylaws changes to the EC that, pending approval, will be brought to membership for a vote.

This was a challenging and productive year for IPA in terms of leadership recruitment. As you know, Dr. Mark Poeppe resigned from his role as 2023 President-Elect in August. I’m grateful for Dr. Dave Beeman who stepped into that role following approval from the EC. Our annual EC election was delayed until we found a candidate to run for President-Elect. I’m thrilled that early career psychologist, Dr. Isaac Hooley, agreed to run. I look forward to serving on the Triad with them in 2024 as Past-President.

Other changes in leadership include Dr. Jennifer Kauder’s election as Diversity Liaison. She and Dr. Lisa Streyffeler will be co-chairing the Diversity and Social Justice (DSJ) Committee, which has been without an official co-/chair this year. Another exciting change is that Dr. Ron Hougen will be chairing and resurrecting the Ethics Committee, which has not been operational since 2022. If you are interested in joining the DSJ or Ethics Committee (or any other committee), please let me know. In 2024, the EC will be welcoming Ashley Banta as our Student Division Representative (SDR) and Tianxin Wang as our Student Division Representative Elect. I want to thank Eric Field for his service as this year’s SDR and his initiative to formally institute, with EC approval, the role of the SDR Elect. It was an idea that will meaningfully add to succession planning and continuity of leadership.

Next year we will be recruiting for two key roles on the EC: Treasurer and IPA Member Representative. Drs. Sarah Fetter and Katie Kopp will be concluding their terms in these positions, respectively. As we do every year, we will also be recruiting for President-Elect. We continue to recruit for a State Advocacy Coordinator, as this position has been officially vacant since 2022. This is a crucial role for IPA and our ability to advocate for psychological science and safeguarding the profession is significantly limited without someone in it. If you would like to learn more about any of these leadership positions, do not hesitate to contact me or anyone one else current in leadership.

I would be remiss if I did not acknowledge our outgoing Past-President, Dr. Nicole Keedy. She joined the Triad in 2021, back when the pandemic was making weekly headlines, psychologists were facing professional demands like never before, and IPA was growing. She has been a steadfast support and leadership partner this year, and this year would have been so much more difficult had she not been by my side. I am grateful for her leadership, kindness, compassion, and friendship. IPA is better for having had her at the helm. Thank you for your service to us all, Nicole.

It has been a privilege to serve you as IPA President this year. My goal was to be a good steward of the association, and I worked hard while navigating leadership challenges and balancing the many other aspects of life. I am proud of what the EC and IPA committees and workgroups have accomplished this year because I believe it is for the betterment of our association, our members, and our ability to meet the mental and behavioral health needs of Iowans. I am excited to see where IPA goes in 2024. For now, though, I will sign off by wishing you a peaceful year’s end in which you spend your time doing what feels meaningful and restorative to you.

ISU Counseling Psychology Reunion on the 50th Anniversary of APA Accreditation

Afternoon meet-up at Della Viti Wine Bar (IPA Members: Dr. Kaitlyn Burke, Dr. Dakota Kaiser, Dr. Summer Brunscheen, Dr. Ashley Freeman, Dr. Sarah Fetter, Dr. Kate Junk, Dr. LeAnn Waterhouse, Dr. Scott Young, Dr. Paul Ascheman)

ISU Counseling Psychology Reunion on the 50th Anniversary of APA Accreditation

On October 28th, several IPA members attended a reunion at Iowa State University to honor the Counseling Psychology Program on its 50th anniversary of APA Accreditation. This event was the first reunion hosted by the department in over 20 years and was spearheaded by ISU Professor of Psychology and Associate Chair, Dr. Nathaniel Wade. The day’s events began with an open house in Lagomarcino Hall. Attendees toured the building, connected with former students and faculty members, and socialized at Della Viti Wine Bar in Ames.

Afternoon meet-up at Della Viti Wine Bar (IPA Members: Dr. Kaitlyn Burke, Dr. Dakota Kaiser, Dr. Summer Brunscheen, Dr. Ashley Freeman, Dr. Sarah Fetter, Dr. Kate Junk, Dr. LeAnn Waterhouse, Dr. Scott Young, Dr. Paul Ascheman)

Afternoon meet-up at Della Viti Wine Bar (IPA Members: Dr. Kaitlyn Burke, Dr. Dakota Kaiser, Dr. Summer Brunscheen, Dr. Ashley Freeman, Dr. Sarah Fetter, Dr. Kate Junk, Dr. LeAnn Waterhouse, Dr. Scott Young, Dr. Paul Ascheman)

Counseling Psychology 50th Anniversary party programIn the evening, we attended a banquet at the Memorial Union where current and former ISU faculty members and a former student shared historical facts about the department and memories of their time at ISU. Dr. Jonathan Kelly, current Chair of the Psychology Department, provided an overview of the Counseling Department. Dr. Norm Scott, ISU faculty from 1971-2017, summarized the intense and multi-year APA accreditation process that concluded in 1973 by designating ISU as the 15th Counseling Psychology Program to be accredited in the United States. The first programs to be accredited were University of Minnesota and Teachers College – Columbia University, both awarded in 1952. Currently, 80 Counseling Psychology programs have APA-accreditation in the United States.

Dr. Doug Epperson, Professor Emeritus (ISU faculty from 1979-2009), outlined the growth of the Counseling Program beginning in 1998 with the hire of Dr. Lisa Larson (1998-2021) followed by the addition of long-time faculty members Dr. David Vogel (2000 – present), Dr. Meifen Wei (2000-2023), Dr. Nathaniel Wade (2003 – present), Dr. Patrick Armstrong (2005 – present), and Dr. Loreto Prieto (2007 – present). Dr. Prieto shared how the Counseling Psychology Department is currently thriving and attributed much of its success to the dedicated work of earlier faculty members. Several speakers, including Dr. Rick Tirrell (Class of ’78) and Dr. Norm Scott (1971-2017), shared entertaining memories of working in Old Botany Hall in the 1970’s before the department moved to Lagomarcino.

Dr. Norm ScottIn addition to honoring the 50th anniversary of APA Accreditation, the evening also honored Dr. Norm Scott, who retired in 2017. Dr. Scott was an ISU Counseling Psychology faculty member for 45 years. Along with his many contributions to the field and to the department, Dr. Scott was appointed by Governor Robert Ray to the State Board of Psychology Licensure Examiners in 1979. He held the appointment until 1983 and chaired the Board from 1981-1983. Additionally, he was the IPA Membership Chair from 1987-1989. Dr. Scott is known for his positive and supportive interactions with colleagues and students. One of the speakers at the banquet, Dr. Rick Tirrell (‘78), was Dr. Scott’s first doctoral student.

A member of IPA since the 1970’s, Dr. Scott mentored 46 doctoral students in his role as ISU faculty including the following IPA members: Dr. Scott Young, Dr. Paul Ascheman, Dr. Dave Beeman, Dr. Mindy Green, Dr. Brenda Crawford, and Dr. Summer Brunscheen. In Dr. Scott’s honor, Dr. Wade announced the creation of the Norm Scott Scholarship Fund which will be used to fund graduate student summer assistantships.

The reunion was attended by current students, former students, current faculty, and emeritus faculty. ISU alumni/IPA members in attendance included Dr. Dave Beeman, Dr. Sarah Fetter, Dr. Kate Junk, Dr. Paul Ascheman, Dr. Ashley Freeman, Dr. Summer Brunscheen, Dr. Norm Scott, Dr. LeAnn Waterhouse, Dr. Scott Young, Dr. Kelsey Engel, Dr. Kaitlyn Burke, Dr. Dakota Kaiser and student member Haley Williamson. Also present were IPA members and ISU teaching faculty, Dr. Warren Phillips (1997- present) and Dr. Nicole Taylor-Irwin (2022 – present).

Dr. Norm Scott and Dr. Doug Epperson

Dr. Norm Scott and Dr. Doug Epperson

The reunion provided a wonderful opportunity to connect with ISU alumni and faculty as well as learn about the rich and storied history of the department. A big thank you to Dr. Nathaniel Wade for planning a great event!

This article was written by Ashley Freeman, Ph.D., in collaboration with the ISU Counseling Psychology Department. See below for additional photos.

Blue wavy line
IPA Members pictured: Dr. Ashley Freeman, Dr. Sarah Fetter, Dr. Scott Young (Class of 2011)

IPA Members pictured: Dr. Ashley Freeman, Dr. Sarah Fetter, Dr. Scott Young (Class of 2011)

IPA Member: Dr. Dakota Kaiser

IPA Member: Dr. Dakota Kaiser

IPA Members pictured: Dr. Kate Junk, Dr. Ashley Freeman, Dr. Sarah Fetter, Dr. Kaitlyn Burke

IPA Members pictured: Dr. Kate Junk, Dr. Ashley Freeman, Dr. Sarah Fetter, Dr. Kaitlyn Burke

Collaborative/Therapeutic Assessment: IPA Fall Conference 2023

Greg Lengel

Collaborative/Therapeutic Assessment: IPA Fall Conference 2023

Greg Lengel

With traditional clinical assessment, clinicians are often guided by the question, “What do I want to know?” As psychologists, we can tend to prioritize own interests and goals when determining an assessment’s purpose as well as the questions we attempt to answer. In doing so, we can overlook the client’s interests and priorities. It’s much less common for a clinician to revise the question of “What do I want to know?” to “What do you want to know?,” and focus the assessment around what is personally meaningful to the client. Additionally, traditional clinical assessment tends to prioritize the identification of what’s “wrong” with the client. However, our client’s interests are often not limited to insights into what is wrong; they also have an interest in identifying their strengths and adaptive traits.

Moreover, it can be easy for clinicians to overlook what it is like to be “in our client’s shoes,” and recognize just how unnerving and intimidating an assessment can be. Think about it—some mysterious person is asking several mysterious questions, administering a series of mysterious measures and tasks with mysterious activities and items–all the while, providing limited feedback along the way. This uncertainty can make assessment a frightening and overall negative experience for our clients, which can potentially have an adverse impact the on the quality and accuracy of the collected data as well as the quality of the relationship with the client.

In light of this, Collaborative/Therapeutic Assessment (C/TA) offers a refreshing change to the traditional clinical assessment approach. C/TA is a brief, collaborative intervention that helps clients gain insight about themselves as well as how they might address their problems in living. C/TA is co-directed by the clinician and client and prioritizes the client’s experience and observations. This type of intervention can elevate traditional assessment and build collaboration with our clients, ultimately fostering healing and personal growth.

I was first exposed to C/TA during my doctoral training, and was instantly intrigued and excited by the approach. What I particularly appreciate about C/TA is that it is a highly collaborative, client-centered approach that facilitates rapport building between the assessor and the client. This positive relationship can enhance the overall assessment experience and outcomes. It also identifies and leverages the client’s strengths along with identifying problems. This provides a much more balanced feedback for the client as well as additional ways the client might address their problems in living, and it can enhance client outcomes.

That said, C/TA can potentially be challenging to incorporate into one’s practice. For instance, C/TA can be time-consuming and requires training and skill development to effectively utilize. Additionally, I know for me personally, the thought of navigating how to bill and be reimbursed for C/TA was quite intimidating, and I was uncertain on how I could realistically incorporate C/TA into my practice on a regular basis. As a result, my use of C/TA decreased significantly after graduate school, when I no longer had the resources and freedoms that came with practicing in a training clinic.

As one can imagine, when IPA revealed the theme for the fall 2023 conference, I was thrilled to learn that its emphasis would be C/TA. Having drifted away from using C/TA in my clinical work, I hoped that this training would reinvigorate my interest in C/TA as well as inform me on how I can practically better incorporate C/TA into my practice. I am pleased to report that the conference was a complete success on these fronts.

In her training, Following the Breadcrumbs: The Basics of Collaborative/Therapeutic Assessment and How it Can Enhance Clinical Practice, Dr. Krista Brittain provided invaluable insights into the essence and significance of C/TA, explained and demonstrated how C/TA can be incorporated into one’s practice, and also empowered attendees to enhance their clinical practices, and ultimately, benefit their clients through the use of C/TA. I especially appreciated how well Dr. Brittain introduced and explained the basics of C/TA in a clear and straightforward manner as well as how she reviewed the empirical literature supporting C/TA. I also enjoyed how she guided the attendees through each of the steps of C/TA in an engaging and interactive way. Ultimately, I left the conference with a renewed understanding of, and enthusiasm for, C/TA, and I was excited to see such a powerful and effective approach be introduced to the IPA community. I now have a much clearer vision on how I can effectively utilize C/TA.

I would also like to highlight that, in addition to engaging and useful trainings and workshops, I sincerely appreciate the fantastic opportunities that IPA conferences provide to connect and network with other clinicians, researchers, and students. It is always wonderful to catch up with friends and colleagues as well as meet new people. I’m excited about, and look forward to, attending future IPA events.

Check out other upcoming IPA trainings and events here

Reparative Therapy: What the Facts Really Are

headshot of Dr. Barry Schreier

Reparative Therapy: What the Facts Really Are

As far back as 1990, Dr. Bryant Welch, Executive Director of the American Psychological Association stated, “Research findings suggest that efforts to repair homosexuals (sic) are nothing more than social prejudice garbed in psychological accoutrements.” Since then, mainstream medical and psychological health associations have taken unequivocal stances against what is called conversion, reparative, and reorientations therapies due to lack of evidence to support positive impact and the plethora of evidence documenting harm.  These organizations include: American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, American Academy of Family Physicians, American Academy of Nursing, American Academy of Pediatrics, American Association of Marriage & Family Therapy, American College of Physicians, American Counseling Association, American Medical Association, American Medical Student Association, American Psychiatric Association, American Psychoanalytic Association, American Psychological Association, American School Counselor Association, American School health Association, National Association of Social Workers, the Pan American Health Organization, and others.

These organizations, who represent the majority of U.S. medical and psychological health professionals have taken this stance not because of political positioning, but because, as the American Psychological Association (2007) noted:

APA affirms that same-sex sexual and romantic attractions, feelings, and behaviors are normal and positive variations of human sexuality regardless of sexual orientation identity;

APA reaffirms its position that homosexuality per se is not a mental disorder and opposes portrayals of sexual minority youths and adults as mentally ill due to their sexual orientation;

APA concludes there is insufficient evidence to support the use of psychological interventions to change sexual orientation;

APA encourages mental health professionals to avoid misrepresenting the efficacy of sexual orientation change efforts by promoting or promising change when providing assistance to individuals distressed by their own or others’ sexual orientation;

APA concludes that the benefits reported by participants in sexual orientation change efforts can be gained through approaches that do not attempt to change sexual orientation.

These organizations have taken stances validating the inherent worth, dignity, and validity of sexual/affectional orientation due to the lack of conclusive empirical evidence that supports that one sexual/affectional orientation is less or more mentally and physically healthy. In fact, the data is so consistent, these organizations had no other choice but to take these stances to uphold their own foundations of evidence-based decision making. Those that continue to advocate for reorientation continue to perpetuate the reductionist, bipolarity construct of sexual/affectional orientation that current science and service left behind 50 years ago when the APA declassified homosexuality as a mental health concern.

The faculty assumptions imbued into the claims of reorientation are numerous and include:

  1. Sexual/affectional orientation is behavior that can be changed.  This approach ignores copious evidence which connotes the multimodality of sexual/affectional orientation. Additionally, current conceptualizations include sexual/affectional orientation as having the components of identity connected to it.
  2. Sexual/affectional orientation is only something LGBQ people have.  Sexual/affectional orientation is something heterosexual people have as well, but ironically is not seen as something open to reorientation.
  3. Religion condemns LGBQ orientation. Religion is a choice and perhaps reorientation could be for religious choice, re-orienting to the major U.S religions that support LGBQ orientations: American Baptist Church; Disciples of Christ; Episcopal Church; Metropolitan Community Church; Presbyterian Church, USA; Reform Judaism; Society of Friends; Unitarian Universalist Church; Buddhism, United Church of Christ, Congregational, and many others. People who are LGBQ have not abdicated religion to those who would seek to change them and many organized religions agree.
  4. Research supports reorientation therapy.  There is bottomless research denoting the bad science of these “studies” and their sufficiency of methodological, participant selection, statistical analyses, and outcome measure problems. Also, unethical behavior, sexual abuse, deception, and theological malpractice are rife throughout this literature. The confines of here do not allow for detailing all of this research, though objective reviews can be found from infinitely wide sources including everything from the Minnesota Department of Health to the Government of the United Kingdom.
  5. Heterosexuality is the Standard.  A mainstay assertion is that people who are LGBQ are undeveloped, regressed, and fixated and thus need changing due to an inability to have mature relationships. It is a specious argument that when people who are LGBQ have problems with relationships, it is due to their sexual/affectional orientation and when people who are Straight have relationships, it is not.
  6. Reorientation Therapies Only Help.  Reorientationists consistently produce data that only indicates that their actions help. The very idea that treatment cannot cause harm is a dangerous and unethical position for any psychologist. Once again, there is a bottomless set of studies demonstrating first-person accounts of the harmful impact of these therapies. These range between them being destructive to them being, at the very best, unable to produce what they proport.

These are a few of the many faculty assumptions that undergird this movement. The leading national organizations who represent the majority of U.S. licensed medical and psychological providers, clearly state that as there is no illness, there is no cure. Prohibitions against such practices, which cannot sufficiently document positive outcomes over risk for harm, exist in 27 states+ D.C. and this number grows annually. It is time, as it is with all medical and mental health matters, to listen to the evidence and move on from practices which rest on bias, poor science, historical limitations, and societal prejudice.

This article was written by Barry Schreier, Ph.D., in collaboration with the Public Education Committee of the Iowa Psychological Association. 

2023 Ann Ernst Public Service Award

Bethe Lonning being presented with the Ann Ernst Public Service Award

2023 Ann Ernst Public Service Award

At the IPA Fall Conference on October 6, Dr. Bethe Lonning was presented with the Ann Ernst Public Service Award. This award honors a psychologist who has made, on a pro bono basis, significant contributions of a psychological nature that have benefited society as a whole. The contribution(s) may have been a single major contribution or reflect a consistent history of volunteer service to the community at large.

Bethe Lonning being presented with the Ann Ernst Public Service Award

I want to thank Susan Barngrover for nominating me. She is unable to be here today as she is battling a serious illness and I wish her well. As I was thinking about what I could say today, I was thinking about the moving speech from Sally Oakes Edman this past spring and decided I couldn’t top that so I will simply say thank you to IPA for giving me the opportunity to serve this profession. Thank you all.

Dear Committee Members,

I am writing to nominated Elizabeth Lonning Psy.D. for the Ann Ernst Public Service Award for 2023.

Let me first give you some background about my association with Bethe. I am a practicing psychologist in Missouri wishing to return to my Iowa roots to gain my RxP supervision, but despite Bethe’s encouragement and mentorship over the last 5 years including going before the state board, I was unable to meet the criteria as a seasoned psychologist (more than 5 years since graduation). Bethe never gave up and it’s the spirit of helping Iowans improve their psychological care that has driven her vision. 

She has been an outstanding advocate for Iowans over the last 20 plus years in the prescription movement. In 2002, when she attended the APA’s Practice Leadership Conference she began to model Iowa’s RxP legislation after that of New Mexico’s. She surveyed the membership twice (before the luxury of tools like survey monkey existed) to gauge their support. Despite the lack of enthusiasm, Bethe continued to sponsor RxP education at the annual IPA conferences to advance its utility and garnered grass roots support by her unflagging dedication and belief to the principles that psychologists can provide more comprehensive care to their patients through a broadened scope of practice.

Dr. Lonning has spent her career promoting the passage of RxP and helped draft the legislation from 2013 to 2016 when it finally passed. She then served on the joint administrative body of the BOM and BOP to establish rules for practice by 2019.   Bethe, never leaves a job undone as proven recently when the governor signed into law the new legislation to broaden the definition of supervisor so that those trained could find an appropriate site as well doing away with the rule that you must graduate in the last 5 years to be eligible.

Dr Lonning has a long track record of public service to Iowans and the psychologists who serve them. Currently, she continues to serve Iowa’s psychologists as Director of Professional Affairs from 2021 to the present. She has held numerous appointments including Regional Chair for APA Public Education campaign 1997-1999, Membership Chair 1999-2004, Psychopharmacology Education Committee Chair 2004-present and a multitude of positions as a representative to APA including the executive council.  She is active in APA on numerous appointments. She continues to advance Iowa psychology and has coordinated the alliance between NMSU and Iowa psychologists receiving their advanced training. In addition, she has worked diligently to begin the post doctoral psychopharmacology program at Drake.

In addition, she continues to run and oversee a busy practice in Davenport all while continuing to promote psychology by serving on numerous other public boards including those who represent Victims and  underserved populations. She has received numerous awards from APA: Outstanding State Contribution Award 2017, Outstanding Psychologist of the Year 2016 and the Karl F. Heiser Advocacy Award 2016. Finally she received IPA’s Meritorious Achievement Award in 2006.

Speaking for the many people whose lives have been enhanced from their personal care and association with Dr. Bethe Lonning including psychologists, patients and Iowa communities, I heartily recommend her without reservation for the 2023 Ann Ernst award. In sum, Dr. Lonning has displayed her resolute commitment to the promotion of Psychology and the many people who have benefitted from her tireless care.

Blue wavy line
Bethe Lonning being presented with the Ann Ernst Public Service Award
Dr. Tallman’s remarks are shared here:

I want to thank Susan Barngrover for nominating me. She is unable to be here today as she is battling a serious illness and I wish her well. As I was thinking about what I could say today, I was thinking about the moving speech from Sally Oakes Edman this past spring and decided I couldn’t top that so I will simply say thank you to IPA for giving me the opportunity to serve this profession. Thank you all.

Congrats again to Dr. Lonning for her well-deserved recognition! Please continue to consider other worthy recipients of all of the IPA Awards.

Top 5 Reasons Students Should Join IPA

Ashley Banta

Top 5 Reasons Students Should Join IPA

Ashley BantaHello, fellow psychology students! My name is Ashley Banta, and I’m the IPA Student Division Representative-Elect. I am eager to advocate for psychology doctoral students in Iowa. Today, I have the top FIVE reasons you should join IPA!

The first reason is networking. Student members have rich opportunities to make professional relationships. Everyone gets paired with a practicing psychologist mentor. These mentors can give you important information about practicum opportunities and future internship sites. Even if you don’t intend to stay in Iowa, you can learn from these mentors and take the culture of “Iowa Nice” out into the wider world!  I have personally benefitted from the connections that I have made with other IPA members.

Second, you can engage in innovation through IPA. Our top-notch trainings and conferences give students valuable tools for their professional toolkit! I learned the values sort activity at an IPA conference and have now used it with several clients! Student members can attend trainings and conferences at a highly discounted rate or FOR FREE.

Third, engage in advocacy through IPA! The advocacy committee does important work in Iowa. Keep up to date with legislation as well as meet with legislators to share your perspective. I attended one of APA’s virtual advocacy summits and learned a great deal from my fellow IPA delegates. It was such a great experience to meet with legislators to discuss the unique perspective psychologists have on various issues.

Fourth, socialize with other members. IPA hosts frequent socials. You will enjoy connecting with students and psychologists across the state!

Lastly, hone your leadership skills. IPA members truly value students’ voices. You are encouraged to join an IPA committee that aligns with your professional goals.

Of course, not all of you are planning on staying in Iowa. But you can still join! Learn with us here and take your knowledge wherever you end up! For the time being, Iowa is your community, and your community needs you!

Being a student member of IPA has been so rewarding! Picking only 5 reasons to join IPA for this blog was challenging because there are so many reasons to join. Come join us and see how many more reasons there are to be a student IPA member!

If you join after September 1, 2023, then your first year of FREE membership includes the rest of 2023 and all of 2024. After that, the yearly cost of membership for students is just $50.

Begin paid content

ad for Trust Insurance

On TikTok University, Therapeutic Assessment, and the IPA Fall Conference

Krista M. Brittain, Psy.D.

On TikTok University, Therapeutic Assessment, and the IPA Fall Conference

Krista M. Brittain, Psy.D.

When was the last time you got a new referral who had seen five therapists in recent years but didn’t feel like any of the clinicians really “got” them or helped them feel better? Or how about  worked with someone who checked their symptoms with Dr. Google or was taking some “classes” at TikTok University? We see folks with these types of experiences every day, and it might seem tempting to roll our eyes or sigh deeply at yet another person who has lived with their pain for so long or hearing about another self-diagnosis/TikTok-diagnosis of autism, DID, or another diagnosis de jour. Through the lens of Collaborative/Therapeutic Assessment (C/TA), these presenting concerns provide a chance to invite data from all sources into the room…believe it or not, even TikTok. When clients/patients come in seeking care, we can create a rich opportunity to deepen a person’s curiosity, increase their ability to understand their strengths and problems in living, develop new narratives about themselves and their life, and support meaningful change in just a few sessions.

If you haven’t completely written this off based on my generous acceptance of so-called “TikTok data,” thank you. And I’ll take this opportunity to remind you of the chance to learn more about C/TA at IPA’s upcoming fall conferenceFollowing the Breadcrumbs: The Basics of Collaborative/Therapeutic Assessment and How it Can Enhance Clinical Practice. You may be thinking, “I do therapeutic assessment!” or wondering what C/TA is and how it’s different from traditional assessment. You may also be curious about how this semi-structured assessment method could enhance your practice, especially if your practice is more (or entirely) therapy focused. Or, if you’re a carb-lover like me, you may even have noticed your stomach rumbling at the mention of bread. While I can’t help you with a snack in this moment, I’m delighted to share a bit about my presentation at the upcoming conference, C/TA, and why (besides the snacks) it might be worth your while to spend the day together, learning and connecting as we engage our curiosity together. 

As a basic introduction, Therapeutic Assessment (TA) just celebrated its 30th birthday and is the only assessment method with empirical support as an efficacious stand-alone intervention resulting in many positive outcomes, including decreased ODD, personality, relational, and emotional symptoms; decreased distress; increased hope; better compliance with future treatment (Finn, Fischer, & Handler, 2012). In practice, or C/TA uses traditional assessment tools in both typical and creative ways. We use all kinds of techniques to do therapy (e.g., sand trays, walk-and-talk, movement, art) and C/TA embraces a similar creativity and diversity in the assessment process. Imagine having a teen and their parents play with blocks during an assessment appointment! Sounds fun, right? During the conference, you’ll see many examples of how tests, data, and a few new techniques that extend the potential of traditional assessment tools can be used to invite clients to follow the “trail of breadcrumbs” they’ve left behind throughout the assessment process. This can range from exploring perfectionism through an Extended Inquiry of the WAIS’s Similarities subtest to re-reading a person’s Rorschach responses in search of meaningful imagery. I hope you will be moved, as I often am, to discover how following the breadcrumbs in these ways can produce deeper, richer self-understanding and begin to inspire new narratives for the people we meet in the work. 

Because becoming curious together allows for new ways of seeing and being through the assessment process, the values and tools of C/TA can be applied in so many of the contexts in which we are engaged: therapy, assessment, supervision, outreach, etc. So, what does this look like in “real life?” Well, for example, each C/TA begins by working with the client(s) to create a list of assessment questions, the questions they are hoping to answer and the things they are hoping to learn through the assessment process. Thus, this approach can also be applied (quite helpfully!) to both therapy and supervision processes. Additionally, through a C/TA lens, it is possible to creatively utilize assessment tools as tools for therapy as we half-step clients toward meaningful psychological change. Furthermore, C/TA provides a framework for multicultural and cross-cultural assessment practice (Rosenberg, Almeida, & Macdonald, 2011), which is a must-have in your clinical tool-belt. Especially in this way, the values and practices of C/TA extend past the assessment arena and into all areas of practice and everyday life to support more affirming relationships.

So, if you think it might be nice to have tools for welcoming data from Dr. Google and TikTok University into the room, look no further! (Perhaps data is data?) And if you like the idea of spending a day connection, learning, shifting, exploring, playing, and leaning into curious, creative, vulnerable assessment journeys, the IPA fall conference is for you! (If you’re into other things, don’t despair, it may still be for you!) Through the conference and C/TA, I hope that you will find a sense of inspiration and renewal—of skills, ideas, relationships, and much more. I’m so looking forward to sharing the time and experience with you, snacks (more than breadcrumbs) included. 

References
Finn, S. E., Fischer, C. T., & Handler, L. (2012). Collaborative/Therapeutic Assessment: A casebook and guide. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 

Rosenberg, A., Almeida, A., & Macdonald, H. (2012). Crossing the cultural divide: Issues in translation, mistrust, and cocreation of meaning in cross-cultural therapeutic assessment. Journal of Personality Assessment94(3), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2011.648293

Begin paid content

ad for Trust Insurance